In article <6C4DD1E7-5BBF-4026-9616-6FB57CC8F8B7@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Lunney Family <family@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Richard and everyone
this is good news; it is really worthwhile running one's eye over the
old messages because there is such a lot of content in them, and not all
of it I remember reading first tie around. There are bound to be new
leads, five or six years old!
Glad to hear you are still somewhat interested Richard; I've taken a bit
of a break from family history, but maybe time to start again!
All the best and thanks for keeping things current
Linde
Possibly the main reason for doing the archives is to get them so the
search engins visit. That should get new blood interested and should then
invigorate the list which has been rather quiet of late.
The old archives, 1999-2001 are in the form of a continuous text file
containing 352 messages. This has to to be split onto 352 numbered files.
Then ther ar monthly files from 2002 to 2007 to be split.
A long and tediouis job, which I cannot easily automate. So don't hold
your breath!
--
Richard Torrens - Genealogy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Genealogy site: http://www.Torrens.org.uk/Genealogy/
Bann Valley, Torrens Families and Youghal genealogy and mailing lists.
--
Trim your reply and do not quote irrelevant parts of previous message.
You may post to the list via:
http://www.Torrens.org.uk/Contact/FormBV.html
To unsubscribe send a mail to BannValley+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List rules and FAQs: http://www.torrens.org.uk/Lists/3_rules.html